“Evidence, as used in judicial proceeding, has several meanings. The two mainsenses of the word are: firstly, the mean apart of aguement and inference, whereby the court if informed as to the issues of fact as ascertained by the pleadings; secondly, the subject matter of such means. The word is also use to denote that some fact maybe admited as proof and also in some cases that some fact has relevant to the issues of fact”. Sir Roland Burrows
By Sir Roland Burrows theres are important aspects that must be considered in evidence, that is:
1. Wheter old
2. Testimony
3. Documentary or real
But, Milton C. Jacobs had different arguement about evidence
“the object of evidence is to inform the trial tribunal of the material facts, which are relevant as bearing upon the issues, in order that the truth maybe elicited and a just determination of the controversy reached”
Milton C. Jacobs saw there is two evidentiary purpose:
1. To reach the truth
2. To make decision
From both of opinions writter can conclude that evidence is an attempt by the parties to resolve the dispute to give certainty of the truth of certain laws, using evidence prescribed by the law so it can produce a determination or rulling by court.
Selasa, 29 Maret 2016
Senin, 28 Maret 2016
Principles of the law of evidence
a.
The
Principle of Audi Et Alteram Partem
A
judge must hear both of problematic sides
b.
The
Principle of Ius Curia Novit
Every
judge knows the law considered it examines, judges should not be deciding the
case on the grounds do not know the law.
c.
The
Principle of Nemo Testis Indoneus In Propria Causa
No
one should be a witness in its own case
d.
The
Principle of Ultra Ne Petita
The
judge may only be granted in accordance demanded
e.
The
Principle of De Gustibus Non Est Dispuntandum
The
Jugde decide the case based only on evidence
f.
The
Principle of Nemo Plus Juris Tranferre Potest Quam Ipse Habet
This
principle determines that no person may transfer more rights than he has
Minggu, 20 Maret 2016
Perbedaan Antara Gugatan dan Permohonan
|
Gugatan
|
Permohonan
|
|
Terdapat
konflik kepentingan antara pihak satu dengan pihak lain
|
Kepentingan
sepihak dan tidak ada kepentingan pihak lain
|
|
Pihaknya
terdiri dari:
Orang
yang melakukan gugatan disebut penggugat sedangkan orang yang digugat disebut
tergugat
|
Pihaknya
hanya terdiri dari datu pihak yaitu pemohon
|
|
Adanya
sengketa
|
Tanpa
sengketa
|
|
Pihak
ketiga dapat ditarik sebagai lawan
|
Tidak
ada pihak ketiga yang ditarik sebagai lawan
|
|
Tersedianya
upaya banding dan kasasi untuk memeriksa putusan
|
Tidak
dapat dilakukan upaya banding maupun kasasi
|
|
Produk
yang dikeluarkan oleh putusan pengadilan
|
Produk
yang ditetapkan adalah penetapan pengadilan
|
|
Disebut
gugatan contentiosa atau gugatan sebenarnya
|
Disebut
gugatan voluntair atau gugatan sukarela
|
|
Sebelum
upaya pembuktian terdapat acara jawab-menjawab, bantah-membantah diantara
kedua belah pihak, baru kemudian diadakan pemeriksaan bukti – bukti
|
Tidak
ada upaya jawab-menjawab, bantah-membantah, melainkan hanya pembuktian
|
|
Tersedianya
upaya hukum banding dan juga kasasi
|
Tidak
tersedianya upaya hukum banding, melainkan hanya kasasi
|
|
Contoh
gugatan:
Gugatan
sengketa warisan, sengketa hak milik, kepailitan, penyalahgunaan wewenang
panguasa, gugatan wanprestasi, gugatan ganti rugi, dan lain-lain
|
Contoh
permohonan:
Permohonan
izin poligami, permohonan izin melangsungkan perkawinan, dan lain-lain
|
Langganan:
Komentar (Atom)